1. iranian threats are designed to keep the peace...the people of Iran want their government to attack, the generals want a war with Israel, so the politicians need to make it look like they want war, but try and set the goal post far enough out of reach that it will never happen...now if the US wants war, they will dance all over that goal post and force iran to attack to keep face at home...
2. Sheep Book?  Lost me hon.. Splain me!
3. THanks forgot about that rule.. I'llt ake my chances.. I have far more 3rd party warnings now than to worry about this potential hehehe Sub my backup LedaOhio6 :o)
4. so much for the sheep show. Now we have "The sheep book!" OMG!
5. Hey, you posted the entire article in the description.. that is a good way to get a warning from Youtube because of copyright. There is a limitation on the amount of words in the article that you can use. Try to find out what that limit is and then end your description with .. Continue reading at: then post the link to the article. P.S. Feel free to remove this comment. RON PAUL 2012! Peace

Iranian Threats Against the U.S. Fool No One!

0.12 min. | 5.0 user rating | 116 views

SOURCE ARTICLE: http://news.yahoo.com/iranian-threats-against-u-fool-no-one-000600847.html COMMENTARY | In continuous ramping up of rhetoric, Iran again has fired a diplomatic shot across the bow at the U.S. This time, the threat came from the Iranian ambassador to Russia, who asserted Iran has the unchallenged ability to attack the U.S. anywhere in the world and succeed. Seyed Mahmoud-Reza Sajjadi said his country is united behind its leaders and capable of retaliating against the U.S., Reuters reported. That's wonderful diplomatic hyperbole, but in reality Iran would receive such a punishing first strike that the few options left would be limited to terror strikes in places where it has secret cells. Sajjadi's warning comes on the heels of Sunday's warning by a senior-level commander of the Revolutionary Guard that made equally inane threats to attack U.S. interests, bases and allies. All of these military threats come with the assurance Iran will not fire the first shot. Does it think it will get a second chance? Gen. Martin Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs Chairman, told Israel last month the U.S. would not participate in an attack against Iran that was not coordinated and jointly approved, Inter Press Service reported. That warning might prove true in the beginning of any conflict, but everything changes the moment Iran launches against Israel. Joint defense agreements would require the U.S. to aid Israel. Any retaliatory attack by Iran on Israeli cities could only result in an aggressive U.S. response. That's further proof of how easy a conflict with Iran could start with no one wanting it in the first place. The rhetoric needs to come down a few steps before the parties are politically, militarily or honor-bound to react. The end result will not be good for either Iran or Israel.
Tags: Iran Iranian threat terrorist attacks fool bluff lie fake news breaking msm cnn fox yahoo